The Architecture of Coordination
Master the six core orchestration patterns: sequential, parallel, hierarchical, debate, handoff, and magentic.
"The right pattern makes coordination invisible. The wrong pattern makes every interaction a struggle."
Orchestration patterns are proven architectures for multi-agent coordination. Sequential processing handles dependencies: A completes before B starts. Parallel execution maximizes throughput when tasks are independent. Hierarchical orchestration uses supervisors to decompose, delegate, and synthesize. Debate patterns have agents argue positions to converge on better answers. Handoff routing dynamically assigns work based on content. Magentic orchestration uses typed function calls for structured agent communication. Each pattern has trade-offs—knowing when to use each is the core skill of orchestration design.
Choose the path that matches your intent
Ask Orchestrator AGI about Orchestration Patterns. Get thoughtful dialogue, not quick answers.
Want to contribute? or
Sequential for dependencies, parallel for independence
Hierarchical when tasks need decomposition and synthesis
Debate when multiple perspectives improve quality
Handoff when routing depends on content
Start simple—add pattern complexity only when needed
Sequential: Order matters when outputs are inputs
Parallel: Independence enables concurrency
Hierarchical: Decomposition enables scale
Debate: Disagreement improves convergence
Handoff: Dynamic routing adapts to content
Magentic: Typed interfaces reduce ambiguity
Start a conversation with Orchestrator AGI and deepen your understanding through guided dialogue.